plugnpl.ai
Market landscape

plugnpl.ai Compared

Companies looking to adopt AI today essentially have three options: combine individual AI tools, license a ready-made AI suite, or build a custom solution. Each approach has its strengths — and clear limits. We built plugnpl.ai as the fourth way.

Days
until plugnpl.ai runs in your tenant
0
price per seat: one platform fee, plus metered use with a cap
12–24 mo.
typical timeline for custom development
100%
code access — no black box
Direct comparison

Four paths. One clear picture.

Individual AI tools
StartImmediate, but fragmented
CostAdds up per tool
Data sovereigntyWith the vendor
Model freedomOne model per tool
Code accessNo
GovernanceBarely
Vendor dependencyHigh, per tool
Ready-made AI suites
StartWeeks
CostHigh per-user licensing
Data sovereigntyLimited
Model freedomLocked to one vendor
Code accessNo
GovernancePartial
Vendor dependencyHigh, single vendor
Custom development
Start12–24 months
CostHigh project costs
Data sovereigntyFull
Model freedomFreely selectable
Code accessYes
GovernanceYes, but self-built
Vendor dependencyLow
plugnpl.ai
StartIn your tenant in days, benefit from the first use case
CostPlatform fee, metered use with a cap per person
Data sovereigntyYour own cloud tenant
Model freedomMulti-LLM
Code accessYes
GovernanceGDPR & AI Act ready
Vendor dependencyLow: code and operation in your tenant

Our reading, as of November 2026.

Azure-native by design — runs in your own cloud tenant.Your data, your infrastructure, your control.

Microsoft Azure logoAmazon Web Services logoGoogle Cloud logo
Decision guide

Which path fits when?

Individual AI tools
Fits when…

You want to get quick, first-hand AI experience without a bigger commitment.

No company-wide rollout possible. Every tool has its own data boundary, license, and learning curve.

Ready-made AI suites
Fits when…

You want an all-in-one product and accept the vendor's terms.

Per-user license costs grow linearly with your team. Switching models or vendors is nearly impossible.

Custom development
Fits when…

Maximum control is non-negotiable, and you have the time and budget for it.

12–24 months of development and a team of your own — before the first person can work productively.

Recommended
plugnpl.ai
The fourth way

You want both: fast results and full control over your data, code, and models.

Your own Azure tenant
Each person's rights via Entra
Models you choose per agent
GDPR & AI Act ready
For your team

What this means in practice

Leadership
Fast. Controlled. Scalable.

Most approaches force a trade-off: fast or secure. plugnpl.ai combines control in your tenant with work across your systems, from chat to Work Support.

IT & Security
No code you can't see.

Full code access, your own tenant, free choice of models. No AI vendor gets your company data — not today, and not after your next model switch.

Finance & COO
We do the math with your numbers.

One platform fee for your company instead of a price per seat, plus metered model use with a cap per person. We set the full cost per outcome next to what you use today.

The shortlist

In the end, three ways remain: rent it, build it, or run it in your tenant with us.

Single tools are fine to start with. For a rollout to everyone, these questions decide.

Assistant of your office suiteplugnpl.ai in your tenantBuild it yourself on Azure
Where it runsthe vendor's cloudyour Azure tenantyour Azure tenant
Rightsyour Entra, the vendor's platform rulesall of each person's rights via Entrawhat you build
Model per taskthe vendor's selectionyour choice per agent, EU-only rulesyour choice, you integrate
Codenoneyou get ityou write it
How far it worksdeep inside the suite, connectors beyondMicrosoft 365 and your systems via MCP; Work Support in buildas far as you build
Who runs itthe vendorwe run it with youyour team
Cost modelper seat, plus consumptionplatform fee, plus metered use with capsyour team, plus consumption

Convinced by the comparison?

Let's find out together how plugnpl.ai fits into your infrastructure.

30-minute call · tailored to your use case · no obligation